Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Full Testimony on Behalf of Norwich Soup Kitchen

The following words were meant to be presented to the Norwich Zoning Board of Appeals at the latest public hearing on the matter of the St. Vincent de Paul Place soup kitchen and their current location at 120 Cliff St.  I was not allowed to give my full testimony, even though I did not go over the three minute time allotment.  I was interrupted and forced to stop about halfway through.  This was due in part because of poor time management of the meeting by the zoning board itself, and I can only guess, in part, because my testimony was not deemed 'relevant' to the matter at hand.  Below is the full testimony I would have given:

Good evening Mr. Chairman, members of the board, and fellow members of the Norwich community.  My name is Rev. Sara Ofner-Seals, I am the minister at Park Congregational Church here in Norwich.  Members of our congregation have supported St. Vincent de Paul Place for many years.  We have participated in their hospitality meal program in the winter months, and we have also served meals both at United Congregational Church on Sunday afternoons and at Central Baptist Church on Friday evenings, where we often serve many of the same people who are patrons at St. Vincent’s during the week.  We occasionally welcome patrons of St. Vincent’s on Sunday mornings in our sanctuary for worship, and are always more than happy to do so.  And so we are familiar with many of the guests at St. Vincent’s-- we have gotten to know many of them and have come to care about them a great deal.

What saddens me the most about this ongoing debate, and the reason I felt personally moved to speak this evening, is the anger and hostility that is being directed at some of the poorest and most vulnerable members of the Norwich community, and those who serve them.  This whole debate has led to such detrimental divisions between “us” and “them” which weaken our ability to work together to solve the problems we face as a community. I speak to you this evening as a minister and as a person of faith.  And from that vantage point, I have to speak to the fact that in God’s eyes, there is no “us” and “them.”  We are all equal in the eyes of God, and we are all valued in the eyes of God.  If we say that certain people are not welcome in certain parts of our city, is that not saying that those people—specifically those who are poor, homeless, or disabled-- are of less value than others?  Does that not create a community in which the poor are viewed as second class citizens, unwelcome and unwanted in certain neighborhoods? Throughout this debate, patrons of the soup kitchen have been characterized as strangers who threaten the safety of our children, as lazy people who choose not to support themselves, as the reason for Norwich’s economic problems, and worse. Does this not betray a stereotype that paints all patrons of the soup kitchen with the same, rather narrow--minded brush—making them out to be some great threat to our common well-being, as opposed to who they really are—fellow members of our community, and our neighbors.

It was said by one board member at last month’s hearing that this issue is simply a matter of “a building, and a use”, and nothing more.  I must respectfully disagree. Anyone who has been paying any attention to this debate these past few months must know that this is about more than just “a building and a use.”  It’s about who we are as a community.  Will we be the kind of city that blames the poor for our problems, and wishes to simply sweep them under the rug, keeping them out of sight and out of mind?  Will we be the kind of community that views the poor, homeless, or vulnerable as merely a problem to be contained?  Do we see the poor and disabled as undesirables who somehow by virtue of their very presence bring down our property value and threaten our security?  Or will we choose to see one another as we are-- fellow brothers and sisters— all of us equal in the eyes of God?  Can we come to understand that “those people” that we are so afraid of are sitting next to us in church? That their children are sitting next to ours in school? That we are but one lay-off or medical emergency away from sitting next to them for a meal at the soup kitchen ourselves?

Make no mistake.  This is about so much more than a “building and a use.” The decision the city makes in regards to this issue will define the very character of who we are as a community.  And so I sincerely hope the board takes the gravity of this reality and the true complexity of this situation to heart in their decision.  Thank you.

Rev. Sara Ofner-Seals
Pastor of Park Congregational Church
283 Broadway, Norwich

Monday, March 25, 2013

On Marriage Equality and the Gospel

Tonight, on the eve of two landmark cases being presented to the Supreme Court on the matter of gay marriage, I would hazard a guess that most members of my congregation in Norwich, CT know where I stand by now.  I hope it's not because I make an issue out of it-- because to me it shouldn't be an "issue."  A person's identity should not be cheapened so much as to be made into an "issue." But I do try to make it clear, through occasional sermon illustrations and in conversation, that I stand squarly and unapologetically on the side of marriage equality.  I could go on and on about my arguments with "biblical" understandings of marriage between one man and one woman, but many others have done so, much more articulately and succinctly than I can, so I leave those arguments to them.  

What I can speak to, and what I'm pretty sure most people don't know, is why I care as much as I do.  I'm not gay.  I don't have a gay family member (I don't think).  Sure, I have gay friends-- sometimes I assume that everyone does, though I realize that's not true-- but that's not exactly it either. 

If I travel backwards from where I am today, I first find myself landing in 2006, when I started a part time job at MassEquality in Boston, MA.  At the time, it was not much more than a part time job to help pay the bills, though I certainly did agree with the politics.  We were fighting to hold onto marriage equality in MA, as a bill to ammend to state constitution with a same-sex marrage ban was in the works.  But what started as a mere part time job to pay the bills turned quickly into a passion. I traveled around the state talking to people, hearing people's stories, listening to my co-workers, who couldn't fathom how a straight Christian girl had found her way into an LGBT lobbying organization. They often joked (I hope they were joking)! that maybe I was a spy from the other side. I heard terrible stories of rejection from young people whose families had told them they were abomonations and that they were going to hell-- yes, people really do say these things.  I heard wonderful stories of solidarity from straight couples who said they weren't getting married until marraige was legal for everyone.  Everywhere I turned, there was equal measure of love, justice, compassion-- but also fear, hate, and ignorance. And in my particular setting, I found myself the only one able to speak from the progressive Christian perspective.  For some people I talked to, it was the first time they had heard a Christian person say to them-- to their face-- "I believe God accepts you, affirms you, and loves you just as you are.  Because God created you just as you are." It's a deeply powerful thing, to say those words to someone who desperately needs to hear them.

When I was growing up, I went to one of those Catholic schools that is the epitome of every Catholic school girl movie and every "mean girls" movie put together.  I was bullied terribly, for no other reason than the fact that I was, well, a big geek.  Looking back now, I am incredibly thankful that such a thing happened to me-- as aweful as it was as the time (and for many years after).  Because the behavior of the students around me only served to shine an even brighter light on the gospel of love that we heard every week in church.  The hate that I felt almost every day from other students was negated by the words of compassion, love, and justice that I heard in the gospel.  I recognized something in the words that people were reading-- even if the people reading the words didn't seem to recognize it or live it themselves.  I saw the contrast, and that made me love the gospel even more.  I couldn't have told you then that I would be a minister, or an advocate for equal marraige rights, or even a religious person.  But what I would have been able to tell you is that the Christian Gospel is about love.  Love for God, love for one another, love for creation, love for enemies and friends alike.  As the apostle John writes in his first letter-- whoever abides in love, abides in God.

What more is there to say than that? 

 

 

The Only Way Out is Through: A Sermon for Palm Sunday

The_Only_Way_Out_is_Through.mp3 Listen on Posterous

Monday, March 18, 2013

Reclaiming Jesus the Savoir

A look at what it might look like to reclaim Jesus the Savior from a progressive perspective

The_Faces_of_Christ_Jesus_the_Savior.mp3 Listen on Posterous

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Followers of a Prodigal God

Part four of a Lenten sermon series on the identity of Christ.  Based on the parable of the prodigal son.  

The_Faces_of_Christ_Jesus_the_Teacher.mp3 Listen on Posterous

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Speaking of Dying

I was recently challenged to think of the last time I heard a good sermon on the topic of death and dying.  And after thinking about it for some time, it finally occured to me that I couldn't come up with an answer because I simply can't remember the last time I heard any sermon-- let alone a good one-- on the subject of death or dying.  I've heard some sermons on resurrection, usually around Easter time.  I've heard a funeral homily or two, which provide some comfort for those who greive, but usually have more to do with giving thanks for a person's life than they do making sense of death. I don't know if I've ever really heard a regular, Sunday morning sermon on the subject of dying.

As a pastor, I can think of several reasons why this might be so.  For one thing, we preachers tend to want to inspire and motivate people with our sermons.  We want people to feel uplifted and revived for another week-- or at least I do.  Which isn't to say that every sermon has to be a "feel good" sermon.  But I do think we tend to shy away from topics that seem too dreary or sad.  And maybe part of that comes from our pastoral instincts.  Throughout the course of a week, we visit with members who have lost mothers, fathers, spouses, and siblings.  We talk with the wife whose husband is running out of treatment options.  We counsel the member who is struggling in their marriage. We hear from the woman who is terrifying she may lose her job.  Or her children.  Or her home.  Maybe we fear that to talk about death on Sunday morning is too much.  Amidst so much suffering, we feel it is our job to offer a word of hope-- not dwell on a topic that will only cause us more pain.

But then, perhaps that is exactly where the problem lies.  We don't seem to think that a sermon about death and dying could also somehow be a sermon about hope.  We seem to have abandoned the idea that the Christian story could have something important and meaningful to say about death. In the words of Fred Craddock, we have "outsourced" death and dying to doctors, hospitals, and modern medicine and technology.  But what about the old story that says in our living and in our dying, we belong to God?  That from before we are born until after we are gone, our souls are cared for and loved by God?  That dying is a natural part of life, not something to be feared, and indeed, merely the beginning of another incredible journey?  We seem to have given all that up.  Maybe because it doesn't fit into the modern American narrative that sees death as the ultimate defeat to be avoided, rather than a natural part of life to be faced with integrity and hope.  

I'm not sure how we got so far away from speaking about death as part of the Christian story.  And I'm not entirely sure how to find our way back.  But it seems to me that we must.  

 

Monday, March 4, 2013

The Faces of Christ: Jesus the Healer

How is it that faith in the healing power of Christ endures despite human suffering?

The_Faces_of_Christ_Jesus_as_Healer.wav Listen on Posterous

Monday, February 25, 2013

The Faces of Christ II: Jesus the Prophet

What would Jesus the prophet have to say about the Norwich soup kitchen controversey?  

Jesus_the_Prophet.wav Listen on Posterous

Sunday, February 17, 2013

The Faces of Christ: Jesus the Mystic

Part I of a six-week sermon series on the nature and identity of Christ

The_Faces_of_Christ_Jesus_as_Mystic.wav Listen on Posterous

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

The Purpose of Repentence

This year, we have barely had time to put away the Christmas decorations before the more somber and introspective season of Lent, which begins today, with the Holy Day of Ash Wednesday.  I call the season somber because, quite frankly, Lent has a reputation for being something of a downer-- particularly when put in contrast with the seasons of Christmas and Epiphany that come before it.  Perhaps the reason Lent gets such a dismal reputation is because a major theme of Lent is repentance, and for many of us, the idea of repentance conjures up emotions of guilt and shame—not the kinds of religious sentiments we particularly like to dwell upon.

But maybe there is more to Lent than just guilt and shame.  Repentance, after all, comes from the Greek word metanoia, which can perhaps be translated most accurately as “a turning of consciousness” or “a change of heart and mind.”  Biblical notions of repentance, and particularly New Testament ideas of the word, have little to do with feeling bad or guilty about past sins, and have much more to do with transformation of heart, mind, and soul as we shift our priorities towards God and the spiritual life.   

It is common in many Christian traditions to “give up” something for Lent.  Again, this practice has negative connotations for some Christians, who remember giving up certain pleasures or comforts during Lent as a practice of self-deprivation.  But there is more to this practice than we may think.  Giving up something for Lent is not just about the avoidance of temptation (something many of us routinely fail at—once again, bring on the guilt and shame).  It’s also about getting rid of some of extra the clutter in our lives in order to make more room for God. It’s hard to experience metanoia if our lives are already so full that there is no room for God’s Spirit to move in and around us, and it’s hard to have a turning of our consciousness if we remain too comfortable with the status quo.  And so we give up certain things during Lent for the purpose of making room for metanoia and a deeper spiritualityMaybe we give up a few hours of television each day in order to make more time for prayer, meditation, or Bible study.  Maybe we give up an extra hour of sleep on Sunday morning in order to be more diligent about worshiping in community.  Maybe we give up that daily latté in order to purchase an item for the food pantry instead.  We make these small sacrifices with the hope that at the end of Lent, we might have experienced some degree of true repentance—a transformation of heart, mind, and soul--metanoia.  

During the six weeks of Lent, there will be many opportunities to engage in spiritual discipline-- whether it be worship, prayer, study, or service.  It doesn’t really matter which discipline you choose to engage in. The important thing is that you choose something-- some small way to turn your heart and mind more towards God.  This Lent, may we all find true repentance, may we all experience metanoia and true spiritual transformation.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Embracing Mystery: A Sermon for Transfiguration Sunday

Luke 9:28-36

Now about eight days after these sayings Jesus took with him Peter and John and James, and went up on the mountain to pray. And while he was praying, the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became dazzling white. Suddenly they saw two men, Moses and Elijah, talking to him. They appeared in glory and were speaking of his departure, which he was about to accomplish at Jerusalem. Now Peter and his companions were weighed down with sleep; but since they had stayed awake, they saw his glory and the two men who stood with him. Just as they were leaving him, Peter said to Jesus, ‘Master, it is good for us to be here; let us make three dwellings, one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah’—not knowing what he said. While he was saying this, a cloud came and overshadowed them; and they were terrified as they entered the cloud. Then from the cloud came a voice that said, ‘This is my Son, my Chosen; listen to him!’ When the voice had spoken, Jesus was found alone. And they kept silent and in those days told no one any of the things they had seen.

file://localhost/Users/saraofner/Desktop/luke.jpg

There is a place in Central America where many people have traveled as pilgrims, attempting to experience something of the divine.  It is a place that has often been described as a meeting place of heaven and earth. In the country of Peru, some 2000 feet above the rambling Urubamba River, are the ruins of Machu Picchu-- an ancient Incan city thought to have special spiritual and ceremonial significance. One of the primary sites at the top of the mountain is called the Intihuatana Stone-- otherwise known as “the hitching post to the sun.” According to legend, when a sensitive person touches their forehead to the stone it opens their vision to the spirit world. It was thought to contain the energy of the Gods themselves. And even though Machu Picchu was eventually abandoned upon the arrival of the Spanish conquistadors, it remains to this day a place where-- even amidst it's ruins-- people claim to experience something mystical and transcendent.

 

Machu Picchu is what is deemed by some in the religious world as a “thin place”-- a place where the earthly meets the spiritual, where human meets divine. Throughout the centuries, people have claimed the existence of such thin places--whether in the ruins of Machu Picchu, the mountains of Nepal, the redwoods of California, or within the walls of the Sistine Chapel. Thin places could be anywhere, though they are most often associated with locations in the natural world. Essentially, they are places where we experience the divine in a way that is unusual or extraordinary. Places where we can become particularly aware of God’s presence within or around us-- where the boundaries between the material and the spiritual become "thin," or seem to melt away entirely. Places in which the world around us is transfigured-- and the ordinary becomes the extraordinary, the mundane becomes mystical.

The disciples have such an experience in our Gospel reading this morning. Peter, James and John follow Jesus up to the top of a mountain to pray, and as they pray, something extraordinary happens. According to the story, Jesus’ appearance changes-- his face seems to shine and his clothes become dazzlingly white. At the same time, suddenly the disciples and Jesus are no longer alone on the mountain. Two men who are assumed to be Moses and Elijah appear and begin talking with Jesus. The text tells us that the disciples have been, up until this moment, “weighed down with sleep.” Perhaps they’ve been up on the mountain for a long time, or perhaps they just got bored, but this certainly wakes them up. Peter, in particular, is stirred into action. Excitedly, he says to Jesus and the others gathered, “This is incredible!  We should build a dwelling so that we can remain here on the mountain with Moses and Elijah!” But that was apparently not the right thing to say, because as soon as the words are out of his mouth, immediately a cloud seems to overtake them. And then, just as quickly as the experience began, it was over. Jesus and the disciples are once again alone on the mountaintop and the world is back to the way it had always been. The mystical once again becomes the mundane.

The story goes on to say that the disciples spoke of their experience to no one in the days ahead. Perhaps this is because they weren’t sure it had really happened. Perhaps they thought they may have dreamt it, and so they kept quiet, not wanting to sound crazy or fanatical to the other disciples. And maybe we can relate to this particular part of the story. Because we hear this tale with our 21st century ears, and perhaps we wonder if the disciples dreamt it as well.  We wonder-- did it really happen this way?  Are we really meant to take this story literally? Is this story true?

It’s hard for us to embrace the mystery and ambiguity of texts like this one because we live in an age where in order for something to be true, it must be literal and factual. To say that a story is true means that we have verified it, fact-checked it, and found the witnesses to be reliable sources-- all things that are difficult to do in a story like this one. Theologian Marcus Borg, in reflecting on whether or not we Christians should consider this story to be a literal, historic event in the life of Jesus, argues that actually, at the end of the day, it doesn’t really matter. He writes that “whether this literally happened is not in any way decisive for it’s meaning.” In other words, no matter how we understand this story, whether we believe it happened exactly this way or not, it still holds meaning for us in our lives today.

And so perhaps the question we really need to be asking, is not “did this really happen?” But rather, “what does it really mean?” And in order to answer that question, I believe that we must first turn our attention to our good friend Peter.

Peter is the quintessential everyman in the Gospels. He is the one who always misunderstands, or reacts inappropriately, or rushes to judgement based on his emotions in the moment. And in that sense he is imminently relatable to us, because we are constantly doing the same kinds of things. And while I’m going to assume that none of us have been up on a mountain with Jesus, Moses, and Elijah, I would hazard a guess that most of us can still understand exactly what happens to Peter in this story. 

Consider this: Peter has this experience up on the mountain-top that one might call transcendent. He experiences what so many before him and after him have experienced in the thin places of the world--a moment when the material world around him is somehow transfigured into something divine and deeply spiritual. God’s presence is suddenly so real to Peter that he rushes to try and freeze the moment.  He wants to take action. He wants to DO something in order to hold onto this feeling of transcendence. But of course, the second he does that, the moment is lost. The second he tries to hold onto the experience, it slips right through his fingers, and the world is once again as it was.

How often does this same sort of thing happen to us? We have an experience that we might call spiritual or even transcendent, and we try to capture the moment somehow, or make some kind of rational sense of it. Yet we find that in trying to explain it or put it into words, it somehow loses it’s depth and intensity. Or when we try to recreate the experience by going back to the same place or doing the same things, we quickly become frustrated when we can’t get it back. And then perhaps, just like Peter, when we can’t explain or recreate the moment, we start to doubt whether it was real. “Was that life-changing experience I just had all in my head?” we may ask. “Was that really God, or did I just imagine it?” 

Maybe some of us can think of experiences we’ve had like this-- experiences that we don’t often speak of to others because we aren’t entirely sure if we believe it really happened ourselves.  Or maybe others of us are simply skeptical when we hear other people talk about having these kinds of experiences-- experiences of these so-called “thin places”-- because there’s no way to prove that they really exist.

At this point, I simply can’t resist recalling a line from one of my favorite books, a book which admittedly is not one that many people would think of as having much spiritual significance, but nevertheless one that holds some relevance on this topic.  Towards the end of the very last Harry Potter book, two of the main characters are in the midst of a rather ambiguous and mysterious situation (I won’t name names in case there are still a few of you out there who haven’t read the books or seen the films), and one character says to the other: “Tell me one last thing.  Is this real?  Or has this been happening inside my head?” The other character replies: “Of course it’s happening inside your head!  But why on earth should that mean that it is not real?”

Perhaps we find this kind of sentiment easier to accept when it’s in a children’s novel as opposed to when it’s put before us as sacred text. But why should that be the case? I think that as people who are both spiritual and religious, we can often do a much better job of embracing mystery and ambiguity in our walk with God. The depth of our spirituality should not be limited to what we can prove. If that was the case, there would be little reason for prayer, or church, or faith at all. And so perhaps we need to make a little more room for mystery. And perhaps one clue for just how we are supposed to do that also lies within our text this morning--when a voice from the clouds says to Peter, “this is my son-- listen to him.”

The key word here of course, being “listen.” Don’t rush into always “doing” stuff. Don’t try to freeze the moment. Don’t try to make sense of it. Don’t try to prove it. Just listen. Just be open to the experience. Because the thing is, there will always be time for practical action. Certainly, we are not meant to spend all of our lives in the “thin places” of the world. Even Jesus and his disciples eventually come back down from the mountain, and almost immediately they are called back into action-- healing, preaching, and teaching. There will always be a time and place for action. However, in our 21st century, post-Enlightenment world, in which we so often favor certainty over ambiguity, action over contemplation, veracity over mystery, it’s important for us to also take time out to listen and to simply be open to the mystery of our faith. Because it is in those thin places of life-- those times and places when we experience the world and ourselves as transfigured--it is there where we experience the overwhelming mystery that is God. And even though we may never be able to adequately explain or recreate those experiences, they are still very real, and they are still very true, because they hold within them the power to change us and to change the way we view the world. And how much more real can it get than that?

This coming week, as we enter into the season of Lent,there is perhaps no better time for us to remember to take time out to listen-- to open ourselves up to the possibilities for God’s mysterious movement in our lives. To be able to experience the thin places in the world around us. Because in doing so, we may just find God.

Monday, January 28, 2013